There’s an old saying that goes “Weathermen were invented to make economists look good”.

Last week we learned that inflation (as defined by the CPI) rose 6.8% over the prior twelve months.  This was the highest reading since June of 1982, and it was much higher than expected.

If we strip out the new and used vehicle prices and the (volatile) food and energy prices the ‘core’ CPI still registered +4.9% vs one year ago.  Not quite as bad but still more than double the Fed’s target number. This data supported Jay Powell’s official retirement of the word ‘transitory’ from the Fed-speak, to no one’s surprise. Inflation has remained elevated longer than the Fed had expected, obviously, but we really need to look at the timeframe related to the issue.

With the supply chain problems and the resulting shortages we didn’t expect inflation to disappear magically in six months. And it didn’t.

Certain costs are ‘sticky’  — notably wages and housing. Once these costs go up, especially if they go up sharply, they aren’t likely to fall any time soon. So big business has an effective ‘free pass’ to raise prices on just about anything at this time and can blame it on inflation. We haven’t seen this kind of environment for a very long time.

So, it’s pretty easy to argue that SOME inflation is likely to hang around for a while. Perhaps a long while.

But at the same time, isn’t this what the Fed has been working toward for over a decade? I don’t think we need to get our shorts in a knot over inflation in the 2.5 to 3% range. And history suggests that used car prices don’t tend to rise – ever: or at least, in this case, for very long. Soon (a relative term) we expect enough semiconductor chips to meet auto makers demand, and this situation is likely to fade away, right?

I believe we can apply the same argument to most anything that is being priced higher because of “supply chain issues”. From a macro point of view, if there is more demand for a product than there is currently available supply, someone, somewhere will figure out a way to meet that demand. Over time, of course.

So where am I going with this? Stocks actually rose last week in the face of the ‘worst’ inflation print in 20 years. Why? Because this is likely the beginning of the end of the inflation surge. Or, in other words, I believe that we are likely near the peak on the inflation front.

And then there’s the fact that many folks may have bought stocks or covered shorts because the inflation numbers weren’t worse. Like so many things in the world of economics, this may look quite different six months further down the timeline.

Ron’s Market Minute — Did We Say Volatile? 

What a week! And I know that I’ve said that more than once this year, but wow, what a week! 

Wednesday was the best Fed Day market session in over a year. The S&P Index* rose 1.6%, erasing losses from the previous two sessions, and ended up two points away from an all-time high. That upward move came despite the central bank’s most hawkish policy pivot in years (as it looks to clampdown on inflation. The pace of tapering will be doubled to $30 Billion a month, with further reductions in the new year. Interest rate projections are now updated to show a median expectation of three hikes in 2022. 

SO why were stocks going up? In a word, much of the uncertainty regarding the Fed moves has been removed. Remember that markets hate uncertainty. In the eyes of investors (especially those who watch the daily gyrations of their portfolios) it’s an assurance that the Fed is looking seriously at inflation. Powell also gave us a strong dose of optimism by confirming that ‘we’re making rapid progress toward maximum employment.’

And then there was Thursday. With blaring headlines regarding the latest twist in the Covid saga, tech stocks once again took it on the chin. 

It’s pretty common for Fed-meeting days to pull the markets one way of the other, and it’s usually unwound within the next few days. So here we are. Volatile as can be as we move into what is (in a normal sort of world) a very positive few weeks in market-land. I’m expecting more positive movement but am not holding my breath and there will still be bumps in the road.  

Ronald P. Denk, CFP®
Investment Advisor
Denk Strategic Wealth Partners
10000 N. 31st Avenue, Suite C-262
Phoenix, AZ 85051
Phone (602) 252-8700
Fax (602) 252-8701
Toll-Free (877) The-Denk


This weekly article reflects news, commentary, opinions, viewpoints, analyses, and other information developed by Denk Strategic Wealth Partners for use with advisory clients only and/or select but unaffiliated third parties. DSWP provides Market Information for illustrative and informational purposes only. If you wish to receive this weekly commentary by email, please contact us at 602-252-8700 or by e-mail at If you are receiving this commentary via email and would prefer not to please let us know either by email or phone.

Ronald Denk is an Advisory Representative offering services through Denk Strategic Wealth Partners, A Registered Investment Advisor. He is also a Registered Representative, offering investments through Lincoln Financial Securities Corporation, Member FINRA/SIPC.

Denk Strategic Wealth Partners is not affiliated with Lincoln Financial Securities Corporation. Information in this commentary is the sole opinion of Denk Strategic Wealth Partners. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. All market related investments involve various types of risk, which include but are not restricted to, credit risk, interest rate risk, volatility, going concern risk, and market risk.

The Update provides information of a general nature regarding legislative or other developments. None of the information contained herein is intended as legal advice or opinions relative to specific matters, facts, situations or issues. Additional facts, information or future developments may affect the subjects addressed in this document. You should consult with an attorney, accountant or DSWP planner about your particular circumstances before acting on any of this information because it may not be applicable to your situation.

Lincoln Financial Securities and Denk Strategic Wealth Partners and their representatives do not offer tax advice. Please see your tax professional regarding your individual needs.

*The indices are representative of domestic markets and include the average performance of groups of widely held common stocks. Individuals cannot invest directly in any index and unlike investments, indices do not incur management fees, charges, or expenses, therefore specific index returns will be higher. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Please see Denk Strategic Wealth Partners’ Client Relationship Summary here for succinct information about the relationships and services DSWP offers to retail investors, related fees and costs, specified conflicts of interest, standards of conduct, and disciplinary history, among other matters.

LFS’ Regulation Best Interest Disclosure Document, which describes LFS’ broker-dealer services, and other client disclosure documents can be found here <>.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns.