Every now and then it seems to me that Mr. Market can be a reactionary beast — one who is looking for any excuse to launch into yet another bad hair day. So far, this week has produced three.

Today’s catalyst (at least as of this writing) is the latest nonfarm payrolls report (NFP) which came in about thirty-four thousand lower than forecast. That would be bad news, but one should note that this is likely a calendar influenced event. Last month’s number came in at more than 50 thousand OVER forecasts. So, the 2-month average is still higher than was forecast for the period.  Go figure.

We’ve talked recently a fair amount about volatility in the markets. Regular readers of this newsletter are aware that the VIX has been a front burner item in recent weeks. Some have asked if the recent level of volatility is truly wild and crazy or does it just seem that way? (Particularly in light of 2017 being a very calm year). For the answer we turn to the good folks at Dorsey Wright Associates (dorseywright.com). They have pulled up the data and the short answer is ‘not really wild at all’. From DWA:

“… thus far in 2018 (through 12/5), there have been 56 days in which the S&P 500 SPX moved at least +/- 1%, which is seven times the amount of such moves we saw during the tranquil times of 2017. However, we need only look back to 2015 to find a year in which we had more +/- 1% days – in that year the market recorded 72 such days. With only 17 trading days remaining in the year (including 12/6), SPX would have to move at least 1% every day until the end of the year to exceed that mark.

However, just looking at the number of days in which the market moved more than 1%, doesn’t necessarily give us a complete picture of overall volatility – just this week we had a day (12/4) when the S&P 500 was down 3.24%. So, could we have a market that is having an abnormally high number of larger moves? Not really. Thus far in 2018, there have been 15 days when the market changed at least +/- 2% and five days when it moved at least 3%. And while each of these moves outpace the mark set in 2015 (10 2% days and three 3% days), we still need only go back to 2011 to find a year that exceeded these numbers. In 2011, the S&P 500 had 96 +/- 1% days, 35 +/- 2% days, and 12 +/- 3% days. Meanwhile, each of the three years preceding 2011 also recorded more 1%, 2%, and 3% days, than we have seen thus far in 2018.

Since 1928, on average SPX has moved more than 1% on 60.26 days each year, more than 2% on 16.76 days each year, and more than 3% on 6.58 days each year. So, while the recent volatility has been painful, from a historical perspective, the volatility in 2018 has been in-line with historical averages.

A few interesting data points:

  • 1932 had more 1% days, 2% days, and 3% days than any other year with counts of 181, 132, and 94 respectively.
  • 1964 was arguably the calmest year on record, having just three 1% days and no 2% or 3% days.
  • Since 1928, there have been 11 years, including 2017, that did not have a day where the S&P moved 2% or more.
  • There have 35 years in which the S&P 500 did not move 3% more. 

It is also worth noting that no days in 2018 fall into the largest one days of the S&P 500. SPX’s largest one-day gain in 2018 was 2.72% on March 26, there have been 1,040 larger single-day gains since 1928. On the flip side, the S&P’s largest single-day decline of 2018 was -4.10% on February 5th, ranking as the 414th largest one-day drop in the index’s history.”

DWA cautions that “Market volatility often pushes investors into making rash and untimely decisions.” Not only is that true, it actually exacerbates the situation by further enhancing the volatility. We hope cooler heads will prevail.


Market Minute – What’s All the Fuss About the Yield Curve?

Many headlines and blogs this week have focused on the yield curve. Unsurprisingly, some have asked “What’s a yield curve?” Here’s the answer: The yield curve is a measure and comparison of the yields of differing-maturities of US Government Paper.

In a ‘normal’ environment one is paid more for tying up funds for a longer period of time.  So, a 30-year Bond pays more interest (if held to maturity) than a 10- or 5-year Bond. If you plot these rates on a graph and draw a line to connect the data points you will see a curved pattern: the line will curve upward as the bond duration gets longer. Occasionally short-term rates will be equal to, or greater than, long term rates. When this occurs the yield curve is said to have inverted.

On Tuesday the daily computation of interest rates showed that the 5-year rate was 2.80% while the 2-year rate was 2.79% or in other words on Tuesday one could get the same yield from a 2-year bond as a 5-year bond. This is unusual, and caused many pundits to become all excited. Why? Historically when another part of the interest rate curve inverts (very specifically when the 2-year bond pays more than the 10-year bond) as it has sometimes happened, this may be a potential indicator of a slowing economy, or even a potential pending recession. 

I guess it makes good headlines to allow a reader to infer that the same affect might happen with 2- and 5-year rates. So, it’s important to note that rate inversions or yield curve inversions are coincident with recessions and it is also true that they sometimes (in the case of the 10 and 2) do precede recessions. However, it is also true that inversions also happen often when there is no following recession. And for that matter, historically a recession has occurred sometimes up to 2 years after the inversion – so as a recession indicator, concerns with a possible 5- and 2-year inversion do not have much usefulness.

That’s enough on this particular point. However, there is a Fed Funds Rate Model that actually has a good track record of predicting recessions. I’ll go into that in more detail in next week’s e-letter. 

“We cannot hope only to leave our children a bigger car, a bigger bank account. We must hope to give them a sense of what it means to be a loyal friend, a loving parent, a citizen who leaves his home, his neighborhood and town better than he found it. What do we want the men and women who work with us to say when we are no longer there? That we were more driven to succeed than anyone around us? Or that we stopped to ask if a sick child had gotten better, and stayed a moment there to trade a word of friendship?”

– George H.W. Bush (1924 – 2018)

Ronald P. Denk, CFP®
Investment Advisor
Denk Strategic Wealth Partners
10000 N. 31st Avenue, Suite C-262
Phoenix, AZ 85051
Phone (602) 252-8700
Fax (602) 252-8701
Toll-Free (877) The-Denk

This weekly article reflects news, commentary, opinions, viewpoints, analyses and other information developed by Denk Strategic Wealth Partners and/or select but unaffiliated third parties. DSWP provides Market Information for illustrative and informational purposes only. If you wish to receive this weekly commentary by email please contact us at 602-252-8700 or by e-mail at lindaw[at]denkinvest.com. If you are receiving this commentary via email and would prefer not to please let us know either by email or phone.

Ronald Denk is an Advisory Representative offering services through Denk Strategic Wealth Partners, A Registered Investment Advisor. He is also a Registered Representative, offering investments through Lincoln Financial Securities Corporation, Member FINRA/SIPC.

Denk Strategic Wealth Partners is not affiliated with Lincoln Financial Securities Corporation. Information in this commentary is the sole opinion of Denk Strategic Wealth Partners. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. All market related investments involve various types of risk, which include but are not restricted to, credit risk, interest rate risk, volatility, going concern risk, and market risk.

The Update provides information of a general nature regarding legislative or other developments. None of the information contained herein is intended as legal advice or opinions relative to specific matters, facts, situations or issues. Additional facts, information or future developments may affect the subjects addressed in this document. You should consult with an attorney, accountant or DSWP planner about your particular circumstances before acting on any of this information because it may not be applicable to your situation.

Lincoln Financial Securities and Denk Strategic Wealth Partners and their representatives do not offer tax advice. Please see your tax professional regarding your individual needs.

*The indices are representative of domestic markets and include the average performance of groups of widely held common stocks. Individuals cannot invest directly in any index and unlike investments, indices do not incur management fees, charges, or expenses, therefore specific index returns will be higher. Past performance is not indicative of future results.